Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.
See also
- Ashcraft v. Tennessee (1944)
References
External links
- Text of Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
